Domestic abuse: overarching principles

Guideline users should be aware that the Equal Treatment Bench Book covers important aspects of fair treatment and disparity of outcomes for different groups in the criminal justice system. It provides guidance which sentencers are encouraged to take into account wherever applicable, to ensure that there is fairness for all involved in court proceedings.

Applicability

In accordance with section 120 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, the Sentencing Council issues this definitive guideline. It applies to all offenders aged 16 and older, who are sentenced on or after 24 May 2018, regardless of the date of the offence. For offenders aged 16 - 18 refer also to Overarching Principles - Sentencing Children and Young People; however, the general principles of this guideline will still apply.

Section 59(1) of the Sentencing Code provides that: “Every court –

  1. must, in sentencing an offender, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the offender’s case, and
  2. must, in exercising any other function relating to the sentencing of offenders, follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the exercise of the function

unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.”


Scope of the guideline

1. This guideline identifies the principles relevant to the sentencing of cases involving domestic abuse. Domestic abuse is a general term describing a range of violent and/or controlling or coercive behaviour.

2.  This guideline applies (but is not limited) to cases which fall within the statutory definition of domestic abuse as defined by Part 1 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. In summary domestic abuse is defined for the purposes of that Act as:

Behaviour (whether a single act or a course of conduct) consisting of one or more of:

  • physical or sexual abuse;
  • violent or threatening behaviour;
  • controlling or coercive behaviour;
  • economic abuse (any behaviour that has a substantial adverse effect on the victim’s ability to acquire, use or maintain money or other property, or obtain goods or services);
  • psychological, emotional or other abuse

between those aged 16 or over:

  • who are, or have been married to or civil partners of each other;
  • who have agreed to marry or enter into a civil partnership agreement one another (whether or not the agreement has been terminated);
  • who are, or have been, in an intimate personal relationship with each other;
  • who each have, or have had, a parental relationship in relation to the same child; or
  • who are relatives.

This definition applies whether the behaviour is directed to the victim or directed at another person (for example, the victim’s child). A victim of domestic abuse can include a child who sees or hears, or experiences the effects of, the abuse, and is related to the primary victim or offender.

3.  For the purposes of this guideline domestic abuse also includes so-called ‘honour’ based abuse, female genital mutilation (FGM) and forced marriage.

4. The principles in this guideline will also apply to persons living in the same household whose relationship, though not precisely within the categories described in para 2 above, involves a similar expectation of mutual trust and security.

5. Controlling behaviour is a range of acts designed to make a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capabilities for personal gain, depriving them of the means needed for independence, resistance and escape and/or regulating their everyday behaviour.

6.  Coercive behaviour is an act or pattern of acts of assault, threats, humiliation (whether public or private) and intimidation or other abuse that is used to harm, punish, or frighten the victim. Abuse may take place through person to person contact, or through other methods, including but not limited to, telephone calls, text, email, social networking sites or use of GPS tracking devices.

7.  Care should be taken to avoid stereotypical assumptions regarding domestic abuse. Irrespective of gender, domestic abuse occurs amongst people of all ethnicities, sexualities, ages, disabilities, religion or beliefs, immigration status or socio–economic backgrounds. Domestic abuse can occur between family members as well as between intimate partners.

8.  Many different criminal offences can involve domestic abuse and, where they do, the court should ensure that the sentence reflects that an offence has been committed within this context.

Assessing seriousness

9.  The domestic context of the offending behaviour makes the offending more serious because it represents a violation of the trust and security that normally exists between people in an intimate or family relationship. Additionally, there may be a continuing threat to the victim’s safety, and in the worst cases a threat to their life or the lives of others around them.

10.  Domestic abuse offences are regarded as particularly serious within the criminal justice system. Domestic abuse is likely to become increasingly frequent and more serious the longer it continues, and may result in death. Domestic abuse can inflict lasting trauma on victims and their extended families, especially children and young people who either witness the abuse or are aware of it having occurred. Domestic abuse is rarely a one-off incident and it is the cumulative and interlinked physical, psychological, sexual, emotional or financial abuse that has a particularly damaging effect on the victims and those around them.

11.  Cases in which the victim has withdrawn from the prosecution do not indicate a lack of seriousness and no inference should be made regarding the lack of involvement of the victim in a case.

Aggravating and mitigating factors

The following list of non-exhaustive aggravating and mitigating factors are of particular relevance to offences committed in a domestic context, and should be considered alongside offence specific factors.

Aggravating factors

  • Abuse of trust and abuse of power
  • Victim is particularly vulnerable (all victims of domestic abuse are potentially vulnerable due to the nature of the abuse, but some victims of domestic abuse may be more vulnerable than others, and not all vulnerabilities are immediately apparent)
  • Steps taken to prevent the victim reporting an incident
  • Steps taken to prevent the victim obtaining assistance
  • Victim forced to leave home, or steps have to be taken to exclude the offender from the home to ensure the victim’s safety
  • Impact on children (children can be adversely impacted by both direct and indirect exposure to domestic abuse)
  • Using contact arrangements with a child to instigate an offence
  • A proven history of violence or threats by the offender in a domestic context
  • A history of disobedience to court orders (such as, but not limited to, Domestic Violence Protection Orders, non-molestation orders, restraining orders)

Mitigating factors

  • Positive good character – as a general principle of sentencing, a court will take account of an offender’s positive good character. However, it is recognised that one of the factors that can allow domestic abuse to continue unnoticed for lengthy periods is the ability of the perpetrator to have a public and a private face. In respect of offences committed within a domestic context, an offender’s good character in relation to conduct outside these offences should generally be of no relevance where there is a proven pattern of behaviour
  • Evidence of genuine recognition of the need for change, and evidence of obtaining help or treatment to effect that change

Other factors influencing sentence

The following points of principle should be considered by a court when imposing sentence for any offences committed in a domestic context:

12.  A sentence imposed for an offence committed within a domestic context should be determined by the seriousness of the offence, not by any expressed wishes of the victim. There are a number of reasons why it may be particularly important that this principle is observed within this context:

  • The court is sentencing on behalf of the wider public
  • No victim is responsible for the sentence imposed
  • There is a risk that a plea for mercy made by a victim will be induced by threats made by, or by a fear of, the offender
  • The risk of such threats will be increased if it is generally believed that the severity of the sentence may be affected by the wishes of the victim.

13.  Provocation is no mitigation to an offence within a domestic context, except in rare circumstances.

14.  The offender or the victim may ask the court to consider the interests of any children by imposing a less severe sentence. The court should consider not only the effect on the children if the relationship is disrupted but also the likely effect of any further incidents of domestic abuse. The court should take great care with such requests, as the sentence should primarily be determined by the seriousness of the offence.

15.  Offences involving serious violence, or where the emotional/psychological harm caused is severe, will warrant a custodial sentence in the majority of cases.

16.  Some offences will be specified offences for the purposes of the dangerous offender provisions (Chapter 6 of Part 10 of the Sentencing Code). In such circumstances, consideration will need to be given to whether there is significant risk of serious harm to members of the public by the commission of further specified offences. The ‘public’ includes family members and if this test is met, the court will be required to impose a life sentence, or an extended sentence in appropriate cases.

17.  Passing the custody threshold does not mean that a custodial sentence should be deemed inevitable. Where the custody threshold is only just crossed, the court will wish to consider whether the better option is instead to impose a community order, including a requirement to attend an accredited domestic abuse programme or domestic abuse specific intervention. Such an option will normally only be appropriate where the court is satisfied that the offender genuinely intends to reform his or her behaviour and that there is a real prospect of rehabilitation being successful.

18.  The court should also consider whether it is appropriate to make a restraining order, and if doing so, should ensure that it has all relevant up to date information. The court may also wish to consider making other orders, such as a European protection order, sexual harm prevention order, criminal behaviour order (this is not an exhaustive list). Further details for restraining orders are set out below.

Restraining order

19.  Where an offender is convicted of any offence, the court may make a restraining order (Sentencing Code, sections 359 and 360).

20.  Orders can be made on the initiative of the court; the views of the victim should be sought, but their consent is not required.

21.  The order may prohibit the offender from doing anything for the purpose of protecting the victim of the offence, or any other person mentioned in the order, from further conduct which amounts to harassment or will cause a fear of violence.

22.  If the parties are to continue or resume a relationship, courts may consider a prohibition within the restraining order not to molest the victim (as opposed to a prohibition on contacting the victim).

23.  The order may have effect for a specified period or until further order.

24.  A court before which a person is acquitted of an offence may make a restraining order if the court considers that it is necessary to protect a person from harassment by the defendant (Protection from Harassment Act 1997, section 5A).

 

Victim personal statements

25.  The absence of a Victim Personal Statement (VPS) should not be taken to indicate the absence of harm. A court should consider, where available, a VPS which will help it assess the immediate and possible long-term effects of the offence on the victim (and any children, where relevant) as well as the harm caused, whether physical or psychological.

 

Compensation order

May be made by: A magistrates’ court or the Crown Court  
Relevant legislation Chapter 2 of Part 7 of the Sentencing Code
Availability 1.    The court must consider making a compensation order in any case where personal injury, loss or damage has resulted from the offence. It can either be an ancillary order, or, a sentence in its own right (which does not attract a surcharge).  The court must give reasons if it decides not to order compensation (Sentencing Code, s.55).

2.    There is no statutory limit on the amount of compensation that may be imposed in respect of offences for an offender aged 18 or over. Compensation may also be ordered in respect of offences taken into consideration (Sentencing Code, s.139).

3.    If there are multiple victims who are to receive compensation, a separate compensation order must be made in relation to each offence. Where there are multiple offences against the same victim, one order for compensation can be made and attached to the most serious of those offences. The duty to give reasons also applies where compensation is awarded in respect of some offences but not all.

4.    Where the personal injury, loss or damage arises from a road accident, a compensation order may be made only if there is a conviction for an offence under the Theft Act 1968, or the offender is uninsured and the Motor Insurers’ Bureau will not cover the loss (Sentencing Code s. 136). Compensation can include loss of all or part of a victim’s no claims bonus.

Considerations 5.    Subject to consideration of the victim’s views (see paragraph 7 below), the court must order compensation wherever possible and should not have regard to the availability of other sources such as civil litigation or the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. Any amount paid by an offender under a compensation order will generally be deducted from a subsequent civil award or payment under the Scheme to avoid double compensation. Victims who suffer minor injuries will usually not be eligible to claim under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. It is therefore of greater importance that appropriate applications for compensation are made during criminal sentencing exercises. A guide to suggested amounts for specific injuries commonly seen in magistrates’ courts is provided below.

6.    Compensation may be ordered for such amount as the court considers appropriate having regard to any evidence and any representations made by the offender or prosecutor. The court must also take into account the offender’s means (see also paragraphs 10 -12 below).

7.    Compensation should benefit, not inflict further harm on, the victim. Any financial recompense from the offender may cause distress. A victim may or may not want compensation from the offender and assumptions should not be made either way. The victim’s views are properly obtained through sensitive discussion by the police or witness care unit, when it can be explained that the offender’s ability to pay will ultimately determine whether, and how much, compensation is ordered and whether the compensation will be paid in one lump sum or by instalments. If the victim does not want compensation, this should be made known to the court and respected.

8.    In cases where it is difficult to ascertain the full amount of the loss suffered by the victim, consideration should be given to making a compensation order for an amount representing the agreed or likely loss. Where relevant information is not immediately available, it may be appropriate to grant an adjournment if it would enable it to be obtained. However, compensation orders are for straightforward cases and a court should not embark on a detailed inquiry as to the extent of any injury, loss or damage – that is better left to civil proceedings, but the making of a compensation order does not preclude a victim from making a civil claim at a later date, subject to the Limitation Act 1980.

9.    The court should consider two types of loss:

  • financial loss sustained as a result of the offence such as the cost of repairing damage or, in case of injury, any loss of earnings or medical expenses;
  • pain and suffering caused (whether physical or psychological) and any interference with day to day activities. This should be assessed in light of all factors that appear to the court to be relevant, including any medical evidence, the victim’s age and personal circumstances.

10. Once the court has formed a preliminary view of the appropriate level of compensation, it must have regard to the means of the offender so far as they are known. Where the offender has little money, the order may have to be scaled down or additional time allowed to pay; the court may allow compensation to be paid over a period of up to three years in appropriate cases.

Combining compensation with a custodial sentence 11. The fact that a custodial sentence is imposed does not, in itself, make it inappropriate to order compensation; however, it may be relevant to whether the offender has the means to satisfy the order. Magistrates should consult their legal adviser in any case where they are considering combining compensation with a custodial sentence.
Effect on other financial orders 12. Where the court considers that it would be appropriate to impose a fine and a compensation order but the offender has insufficient means to pay both, priority should be given to compensation. Compensation also takes priority over the surcharge where the offender’s means are an issue.
Collection order 13. The court must make an order (“a collection order”) relating to the payment of the sum due, unless it appears to the court that it is impracticable or inappropriate to make the order.

The collection order must state:

(a)  the amount of the sum due, including the amount of any fine, compensation order or other sum

(b)  whether the court considers the offender to be an existing defaulter and if so whether the existing default (or defaults) can be disregarded

(c)  whether the court has made an attachment of earnings order or an application for benefit deductions

(d)  if the court has not made an attachment of earnings order or application for benefit deductions, the payment terms

(e)  if an attachment of earnings order or application for benefit deductions has been made, the reserve terms (in other words, the payment terms that will apply if the AEO or ABD fails). It will often be appropriate to set a reserve term of payment in full within 14 days.

Schedule 5 to the Courts Act 2003

Consequences of non-payment 14. Failure to pay a compensation order is a criminal matter and carries a penal sanction.
Crown Court only 15. No sentence in default can be imposed unless the compensation order is for £20,000 or more, in which case it is enforceable as a fine of such an amount.

Suggested starting points for lower level physical and mental injuries

Restraining order on conviction

May be made by A magistrates’ court or the Crown Court  
Relevant legislation Sentencing Code, s.360
Availability On sentence for any offence, a court may make a restraining order in addition to dealing with the offender for the offence.
Nature of the order A restraining order may be made for the purpose of protecting the victim(s) of the offence (or any other person mentioned in the order) from future conduct by the offender which amounts to harassment or will cause a fear of violence.

The order prohibits the offender from doing anything described in the order.

“Conduct” includes speech, and “harassment” includes alarming the person or causing them distress.

Notice The general rule is that the offender must be given an opportunity to consider:

  • what order is proposed and why, and
  • any evidence in support of the application

(see Criminal Procedure Rules 31.2 and 31.3 for further details)

Deciding whether to make a restraining order on conviction The court must be satisfied that making the order is necessary for the purpose of protecting the person(s) from the relevant conduct. This requires an evidence-based conclusion to be reached that it is at least likely that the offender will engage in such conduct in the future.

The order cannot be made merely to assuage the consequences of past conduct. However, this does not mean that that the consequences for the person to be protected of the past conduct, and the likely consequences of any future conduct, are irrelevant. The degree of harassment involved in the past conduct and/or the level of fear and distress it has caused are relevant when determining whether to make a restraining order and the terms of any order.

Further evidence (in addition to that which relates to the offence of which the offender has been convicted ) may be led by the prosecution and/or the offender, provided that it would be admissible in civil proceedings for an injunction under s.3 of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 (Sentencing Act 2020, s.362). Hearsay evidence may be received.

Taking into account the views of the person(s) to be protected In normal circumstances before an application for restraining order is considered by the court, sufficient enquiries should be made to obtain the views of the person to be protected as to whether they wish the order to be made and if so as to its terms.

These views should be taken into account by the court when deciding whether to make the order (and if so its terms).

There is no requirement for the court to receive direct evidence of the views of the person to be protected. In appropriate cases, the court may be able to draw a proper inference as to the views of the person.

There may be cases where the order will be appropriate even though the person to be protected does not seek it. However, such an order may be impractical if the person to be protected does not want the order to be made because they want to have contact with the offender (see also Offences in a domestic context below).

Content of a restraining order General considerations

A restraining order may only include prohibitions. There is no power to include requirements or to make any prohibition subject to electronic monitoring.

The prohibitions in the order must be:

  • necessary to protect the person(s) to be protected from future conduct which either amounts to harassment of that person or will cause them to fear violence
  • proportionate to that purpose, and
  • clear and precise so that there is no doubt what the offender is prohibited from doing

A restraining order must not conflict with an order of the family court or make such an order unworkable or  impractical

Identifying the person(s) to be protected

Generally, a restraining order should name the person (or a defined group of people) to be protected. The order cannot be made for the protection of the world at large or for excessively wide groups of people (such as “any child under 16”). The person to be protected can be a corporate body or the unnamed employees of a corporate body.

Offences in a domestic context

Where the making of a restraining order might interfere with otherwise appropriate contact between a parent and a child, sufficient enquiries should be made about the practicalities of the order and particular care should be taken to ensure that the order does not make it impossible for contact to take place.

In cases where the court has determined that it is necessary to make a restraining order despite a view expressed by an adult person to be protected that they do not wish the order to be made, the prohibitions in the order cannot operate to prevent the relationship between the person to be protected and the offender from continuing (including by living together). Persons at a serious risk of harm from an offender have the right to continue a relationship with that person and to live with them if they choose.

In this situation, the restraining order may include terms which prohibit conduct such as:

  • molesting the person to be protected
  • going to a particular place away from the home (in order for the person to be protected to have a safe space to go should they wish to be away from the offender)
  • contacting the person to be protected for a specified period (e.g. 14 days) if the person to be protected has asked for a break

Geographical exclusion

  • A restraining order should not prohibit the offender from going to a place such as the home or workplace of the person to be protected without specifying the address in the order or any other circumstances in which the offender might become aware of a new address
  • A geographical exclusion can be for a wider area than a particular address (or road where that address is located) if it is necessary in the particular circumstances of the case.    Exclusion from a town might be necessary, even if the offender had lived there before being sent to custody for the offence
  • The term of the order prohibiting entry into a geographical area must be clearly expressed and accompanied either by a map or by a clear written description of the prohibited area.
Commencement of order A restraining order can start on the day on which it is made or any subsequent day. The date of its commencement must be specified clearly in the order to avoid uncertainty and difficulties of enforcement.

Where an offender has been sentenced to custody for the offence, a restraining order should start from the date of sentence and not from the date of release of the offender from custody.

Length of order The order may have effect for a specified period or until further order.

The court should make the order for no longer than is necessary for the purpose of protecting the protected person(s) from future conduct by the offender which either amounts to harassment of the protected person(s) or will cause them to fear violence.

Effect of the order It is an offence for the offender, without reasonable excuse, to do anything that they are prohibited from doing by a restraining order.
Consequences of breach Breach of a restraining order is a criminal offence, maximum penalty five years’ custody.

Breach of a protective order (restraining and non-molestation orders)